Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Jennifer P. WILNER, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 26, 2004, which ruled that claimant's request for a hearing was untimely.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant failed to timely request a hearing challenging the March 25, 2004 initial determinations ruling that she was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause and assessing a recoverable overpayment of benefits upon a finding that claimant made willful false statements for the purpose of obtaining benefits. Claimant admitted to receiving all three determinations shortly after they were mailed on March 25, 2004, but claims that she misread them and failed to realize that the overpayment of benefits was recoverable. It was not until July 2004, after receiving an overdue benefit repayment notice, that claimant requested a hearing. Notwithstanding claimant's proffered excuse, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision that claimant failed to offer a valid reason for not complying with the 30-day statutory period in which to request a hearing (see Labor Law § 620[1][a]; see also Matter of Diaz [Commissioner of Labor], 6 A.D.3d 1024, 775 N.Y.S.2d 607 [2004]; Matter of Velez [Commissioner of Labor], 285 A.D.2d 882, 883, 727 N.Y.S.2d 362 [2001] ). Accordingly, claimant's attempt to argue the merits of the initial determinations are not properly before this Court.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 09, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)