Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: SHAWN MCGUIRK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. SARA MCGUIRK, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to article 6 of the Family Court Act, petitioner father appeals from an order that dismissed his amended petition seeking modification of a prior order of custody and visitation, at the close of the father's proof, for failure to establish a change in circumstances. We affirm.
Contrary to the father's contention, Family Court did not err in taking judicial notice of the prior family court proceedings between the father and respondent mother. “At the outset of the hearing ․ and without objection from the [father], the court took judicial notice of the prior orders and proceedings involving the parties, which was proper in any event” (Matter of Hermann v Williams, 179 AD3d 1545, 1546 [4th Dept 2020]; see Matter of Gugino v Tsvasman, 118 AD3d 1341, 1342 [4th Dept 2014]).
With respect to the merits, “[i]t is well established that alteration of an established custody arrangement will be ordered only upon a showing of a change in circumstances which reflects a real need for change to ensure the best interest[s] of the child” (Matter of Austin v Wright, 151 AD3d 1861, 1862 [4th Dept 2017] [internal quotation marks omitted]). On appeal, the father contends that he established a change in circumstances because the prior order's requirement that he request visitation with 72 hours’ advance notice was hindering his visitation. Even assuming, arguendo, that the father's contention is properly before us, we note that the father conceded at the hearing that the mother had never unreasonably denied him visitation and that he was able to request additional visitation from the mother, but he simply had not done so. Thus, “the record supports the court's determination that [the father] failed to meet [his] burden of establishing a sufficient change in circumstances since the entry of the prior order” (Matter of Graham v Thering, 55 AD3d 1319, 1320 [4th Dept 2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 714 [2008]).
Entered: June 5, 2026
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 473
Decided: June 05, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)