Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: TODD C. CARVILLE, AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF COUNTY OF ONEIDA, PETITIONER, v. HON. BERNADETTE T. CLARK, AS JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, AND KAITLYN CONLEY, RESPONDENTS.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the petition is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this original CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking a writ of prohibition barring respondents from enforcing an order that, inter alia, denied the application of the Oneida County Sheriff's Office pursuant to CPL 160.50 (1) to unseal the record of a criminal action terminated in favor of respondent Kaitlyn Conley (see generally People v Conley, 234 AD3d 1363 [4th Dept 2025]). We conclude that the petition must be dismissed.
Applications to unseal a record of a terminated criminal action are civil in nature (see Matter of Katherine B. v Cataldo, 5 NY3d 196, 201 n 1 [2005]; Matter of Hynes v Karassik, 47 NY2d 659, 661 n 1 [1979], rearg denied 48 NY2d 656 [1979]; People v M.E., 121 AD3d 157, 159 [4th Dept 2014]), and an article 78 proceeding may not be brought “to challenge a determination ․ which was made in a civil action ․ unless it is an order summarily punishing a contempt committed in the presence of the court” (CPLR 7801 [2]; see Matter of Gench v Manchester Realty Assoc., 106 AD3d 735, 736 [2d Dept 2013]; Matter of Kearse v Coughlin, 151 AD2d 760, 760 [2d Dept 1989], lv denied 74 NY2d 614 [1989]; see generally Matter of Sibley v Steuben County Pistol Permit Clerk, 194 AD3d 1393, 1393 [4th Dept 2021]).
Entered: June 5, 2026
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 378
Decided: June 05, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)