Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
OTIS REESE, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants–Respondents.
Sim & Associates PLLC, Bayside (Sang J. Sim of counsel), for appellant.
Steven Banks, Corporation Counsel, New York (Jonathan A. Popolow of counsel), for City of New York, Michael Cautillo and Michael Bletcha, respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Myrna Socorro, J.), entered on or about July 14, 2025, which denied plaintiff's motion to vacate a stipulation of settlement, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff failed to demonstrate good cause to vacate the stipulation of settlement (see Hallock v. State, 64 N.Y.2d 224, 230 [1984]; Matter of Kanter, 209 A.D.2d 365, 366 [1st Dept 1994] ). Counsel-of-record, Sameer Nath, participated in all settlement conferences and was cloaked with apparent authority if not actual authority to settle the case (see Global Bank v. 43 Mott Realty Owner, LLC, 246 AD3d 658, 659 [1st Dept 2026]; Hawkins v. City of New York, 40 AD3d 327 [1st Dept 2007] ). That Nath, in signing the stipulation on plaintiff's behalf, relied on the representations of plaintiff's former criminal defense attorney, who also participated in the settlement negotiations with plaintiff's knowledge, that plaintiff would settle for $250,000 does not warrant vacatur (see Pruss v Infiniti of Manhattan, Inc., 180 AD3d 163, 168–169 [1st Dept 2020], lv dismissed 35 NY3d 1001 [2020] ). Defendants reasonably relied on Nath's authority to sign and plaintiff's former criminal counsel authority to negotiate (see Hawkins v. City of New York, 40 AD3d at 327). Moreover, in waiting four months to moved to vacate the stipulation, plaintiff implicitly ratified it (see id.; Matter of Silicone Breast Implant Litig., 306 A.D.2d 82, 85 [1st Dept 2003] ).
We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Index No. 32170 /18
Decided: June 04, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)