Nikgjonaj Realty Corp., Petitioner-Landlord-Appellant, v. Gloria Garber, Respondent-Tenant-Respondent. (2026)

Per Curiam.

Order (Howard Jacob Baum, J.), dated January 27, 2025, affirmed, with $10 costs.

Civil Court properly granted tenant's cross-motion to dismiss the petition alleging a violation of a "substantial obligation of the tenancy." The notice to cure and notice of termination were defective because they "fail[ed] to cite any specific prohibition in the lease which had been violated by" the alleged conditions in the apartment (Chinatown Apts., Inc. v Chu Cho Lam, 51 NY2d 786, 788 [1980]; see 49 W. 12 Tenants Corp. v Seidenberg, 6 AD3d 243, 244 [2004]; Bray Realty, LLC v Pilaj, 59 Misc 3d 130[A], 2018 NY Slip Op 50426[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2018]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur I concur I concur

Decision Date: May 20, 2026