BRICE v. TWO SIGMA INVESTOR SOLUTIONS LP (2026)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Samuel BRICE, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. TWO SIGMA INVESTOR SOLUTIONS, LP, Defendant–Respondent.

Index No. 154176 /24

Decided: October 06, 2026

Mendez, J.P., Rodriguez, Pitt-Burke, Rosado, O'Neill Levy, JJ.

Samuel D. Brice, appellant pro se. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, New York (Laura Sack of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (James E. d'Auguste, J.), entered on or about May 8, 2025, which granted defendant's motion to stay the action and to compel arbitration, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

Plaintiff did not oppose defendant's motion to stay the action and to compel arbitration. He is not aggrieved by Supreme Court's granting of the motion and therefore may not appeal from it (CPLR 5511; see Leader v. Parkside Group, 159 AD3d 523, 523 [1st Dept 2018] ).

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network