Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
RALPH A. TORRILLO, SR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPHINE A. TORRILLO, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD C. CHERNY, M.D., HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF CENTRAL NEW YORK, P.C., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND SANTO M. DIFINO, M.D., DEFENDANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by granting that part of the motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint, as amplified by the bill of particulars, insofar as it asserts a claim of vicarious liability against defendant Hematology-Oncology Associates of Central New York, P.C. based on the alleged medical malpractice of defendant Santo M. DiFino, M.D., and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this medical malpractice and wrongful death action seeking damages for injuries that plaintiff's decedent sustained after undergoing surgery. Richard C. Cherny, M.D., Hematology-Oncology Associates of Central New York, P.C. (HOA) (collectively, defendants), and defendant Santo M. DiFino, M.D. moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. Supreme Court granted that part of the motion with respect to DiFino and otherwise denied the motion. Defendants appeal.
We agree with defendants that the court erred in denying that part of their motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint, as amplified by the bill of particulars, insofar as it asserts that HOA is vicariously liable for the alleged malpractice of DiFino, and we therefore modify the order accordingly (see Bieger v Kaleida Health Sys., Inc., 195 AD3d 1473, 1475 [4th Dept 2021]). For reasons stated in the decision and order at Supreme Court, we reject defendants’ remaining contention on appeal.
Entered: July 24, 2026
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 461
Decided: July 24, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)