Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. WESLEY N. THIGPEN, ALSO KNOWN AS WESLEY THIGPEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of predatory sexual assault against a child (Penal Law former § 130.96), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that he was denied his statutory right to a speedy trial. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid, we conclude that defendant properly concedes that his speedy trial contention is unpreserved for our review (see People v Stoby, 232 AD3d 1298, 1298-1299 [4th Dept 2024], lv denied 43 NY3d 947 [2025]). Defendant also contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based upon defense counsel's alleged failure to pursue an allegedly meritorious speedy trial motion. That contention “survives his guilty plea only insofar as he demonstrates that the plea bargaining process was infected by [the] allegedly ineffective assistance or that [he] entered the plea because of [his] attorney[’s] allegedly poor performance” (People v Boone, 242 AD3d 1518, 1519 [4th Dept 2025], lv denied 45 NY3d 944 [2026]; see also People v Brinson, 151 AD3d 1726, 1726 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 1124 [2017]). To the extent that defendant's contention survives his plea, we conclude that it lacks merit. The record establishes that defendant received a favorable plea bargain, and that defendant received meaningful representation (see Boone, 242 AD3d at 1519; People v Reynolds, 239 AD3d 1363, 1364 [4th Dept 2025]). Contrary to defendant's assertion, we conclude “that there is nothing clear cut about [defendant's] CPL 30.30 claim” (Boone, 242 AD3d at 1519 [internal quotation marks omitted]). To the extent that defendant's contention is based on matters outside the record, we note that a CPL 440.10 proceeding is the appropriate forum for reviewing his claim (see Stoby, 232 AD3d at 1299).
Entered: July 24, 2026
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 485
Decided: July 24, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)