Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: YMANI C. D., a Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Peter J. D., Respondent–Appellant, v. Kendra D. M., Respondent, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Respondent.
Order of fact-finding, Family Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Passidomo, J.), entered on or about December 5, 2019, which, after a hearing, determined that respondent father neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding of neglect was supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act §§ 1012[f][i][B], 1046[b][i]; Matter of Tammie Z., 66 N.Y.2d 1, 3, 494 N.Y.S.2d 686, 484 N.E.2d 1038 [1985]). There is no basis to disturb the court's credibility determinations (see Matter of Jared S. [Monet S.], 78 A.D.3d 536, 911 N.Y.S.2d 339 [1st Dept. 2010], lv denied 16 N.Y.3d 705, 2011 WL 589734 [2011]). The mother's testimony and the agency's progress notes showed that the father engaged in a physical altercation with the mother while in the presence of the child, who was aware of what was transpiring (see Matter of J.R.M.-C. [Antonio M.], 176 A.D.3d 623, 624, 110 N.Y.S.3d 676 [1st Dept. 2019]; Matter of Jamya C. [Jermaine F.], 165 A.D.3d 410, 410, 82 N.Y.S.3d 715 [1st Dept. 2018]). The child's out-of-court statements that she saw her parents fighting, and that the parents were fighting over her, were corroborated by the progress notes and the testimonial evidence (Matter of Zamir D. [Peter J.D.], 201 A.D.3d 403, 403, 156 N.Y.S.3d 724 [1st Dept. 2022]).
Contrary to the father's contention, the record supports a finding that the child's emotional and mental condition was either impaired or certainly in imminent danger of being impaired by her witnessing her parents engage in the physical altercation. The mother testified that the child was crying during the altercation, and the progress notes reflect that the caseworker had to calm the child down each time she tried to discuss the incident with the child (see Matter of Nia J. [Janet Jordan P.], 107 A.D.3d 566, 567, 968 N.Y.S.2d 446 [1st Dept. 2013]).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 510
Decided: June 22, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)