Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Vonetta SIMPSON, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Carl MACKENDRICK, Defendant, Napoli Shkolnik, PLLC, Nonparty Intervenor–Appellant.
Order, New York County (Lisa S. Headley, J.), entered April 8, 2022, which, to the extent appealed from, granted nonparty intervenor Napoli Shkolnik, PLLC's motion for attorney's fees to the extent of awarding the total sum of $300 for legal services rendered on behalf of plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The motion court's award to Napoli, plaintiff's prior counsel, of $300 for the costs incurred in connection with its preliminary investigation of the matter, rather than 40% of the net contingency fee that Napoli sought, was a provident exercise of discretion (see Han Soo Lee v. Riverhead Bay Motors, 110 A.D.3d 436, 972 N.Y.S.2d 240 [1st Dept. 2013]; Hinds v. Kilgallen, 83 A.D.3d 781, 782, 920 N.Y.S.2d 675 [2d Dept. 2011]). The court providently apportioned the legal fee to reflect that current counsel, Scott A. Wolinetz, P.C., not Napoli, commenced the lawsuit that resulted in the settlement of plaintiff's workers’ compensation action. Napoli only preliminarily investigated the matter over approximately three months, including obtaining medical records from only one of plaintiff's several medical providers and submitting certain no-fault and workers’ compensation applications and medical authorizations. By contrast, Wolinetz demonstrated that it commenced the underlying action, conducted discovery and depositions, engaged in motion practice, and negotiated the settlement that resulted in an award to plaintiff.
We have considered Napoli's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 318
Decided: May 25, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)