IN RE: Saundrea COLEMAN (2023)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

IN RE: Saundrea COLEMAN, Petitioner–Appellant, v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS IN the CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Respondents–Respondents.

364-, 365

Decided: May 11, 2023

Moulton, J.P., González, Mendez, Rodriguez, Higgitt, JJ.

Advocates for Justice, Chartered Attorneys, New York (Arthur Z. Schwartz of counsel), for appellant. Sylvia O. Hinds–Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Elina Drucker of counsel), for Board of Elections in the City of New York, respondent. Paul D. Newell, New York, for Hilda Solomon and Mary L. Jimperson, respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lucy Billings, J.), entered on or about May 1, 2023, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Lucy Billings, J., without costs or disbursements. Judgment, same court and Justice, entered on or about May 3, 2023, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner did not provide a transcript of oral argument in which the court set forth its reasoning at greater length. Based on the record presented, we affirm.

No opinion. Order filed.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network