Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JAHKAI S. AND JAZMINE S. ONONDAGA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; SHIRLEY S., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, respondent mother appeals from an order that, inter alia, adjudged that she neglected the children who are the subject of this proceeding. We affirm. Petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that the mental or emotional condition of each child was in imminent danger of becoming impaired as a result of the mother's failure to exercise a minimum degree of care (see Family Ct Act §§ 1012 [f] [i]; 1046 [b] [i]). The evidence at the hearing established that the mother called for an ambulance to transport her to a hospital's Comprehensive Psychiatric Emergency Program because she did not feel safe at home; upon admission she was found to be psychotic and unable to care for herself. The mother admitted to regular PCP use, including its use earlier that week, and admitted that she had not taken her psychiatric medication in a month. Moreover, the mother was unable to plan for the children's care on her own. We conclude that petitioner established imminent danger—i.e., “near or impending” injury or impairment—to the children as a result of the combination of the mother's mental illness, her failure to take her prescribed medication, and her use of illicit drugs (Matter of Zackery S. [Stephanie S.], 170 AD3d 1594, 1595 [4th Dept 2019] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Trinity B.-S. [William R.N.], 198 AD3d 1331, 1332 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 37 NY3d 919 [2022]; Matter of Faith K. [Cindy R.], 194 AD3d 1402, 1403 [4th Dept 2021]; Matter of Lyndon S. [Hillary S.], 163 AD3d 1432, 1433 [4th Dept 2018]; see generally Nicholson v Scoppetta, 3 NY3d 357, 369 [2004]). Contrary to the mother's contention, the evidence was sufficient to establish a causal connection between the mother's failure to treat her mental illness and the potential harm to the children (see Lyndon S., 163 AD3d at 1433-1434; see generally Matter of Afton C. [James C.], 17 NY3d 1, 9 [2011]).
We have considered the mother's remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit.
Entered: May 5, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 227
Decided: May 05, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)