Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: BERLLIN B.O., A Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Shakira O., Respondent–Appellant, v. Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Keith E. Brown, J.), entered on or about May 5, 2022, to the extent it brings up for review a fact-finding order, same court and Judge, entered on or about February 24, 2022, which found that respondent mother neglected the subject child by inflicting excessive corporal punishment against her, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. The record demonstrated that respondent inflicted excessive corporal punishment on her daughter after breaking down the door to the bathroom, where the child had fled for safety. Respondent then cornered the child against the toilet, struck her on the leg with a cable, and hit her in the face causing her mouth to bleed. The discipline far exceeded any reasonable force that respondent had a common-law right to use to discipline her child (see Matter of Genesis F. [Xiomaris S.], 121 A.D.3d 526, 526, 994 N.Y.S.2d 341 [1st Dept. 2014]). Even a single incident of excessive corporal punishment can support a neglect finding (see Matter of Liza F. [Bon F.], 177 A.D.3d 570, 571, 111 N.Y.S.3d 532 [1st Dept. 2019]). The child's and her older brother's out-of-court statements, as testified to by the caseworker, were corroborated by the photographs depicting the brother's injuries taken by the police on the day of the incident and the mother's admission to beating the girl (see Matter of Empress B. [Henrietta L.], 204 A.D.3d 562, 563, 165 N.Y.S.3d 298 [1st Dept. 2022]). The court's credibility determinations are supported by the record (see Matter of Syeda A. [Syed I.], 186 A.D.3d 1145, 1146, 131 N.Y.S.3d 14 [1st Dept. 2020]), and a negative inference was properly drawn for respondent's failure to testify (see Matter of Antonio S. [Antonio S., Sr.], 154 A.D.3d 420, 421, 61 N.Y.S.3d 226 [1st Dept. 2017]).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 108
Decided: April 27, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)