Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Cornell SIMS, Defendant–Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J.), entered on or about November 18, 2014, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–c), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court correctly assessed 15 points under the risk factor for drug or alcohol abuse. Defendant admitted to a long history of drug use that was not remote in time, and drug testing resulted in a referral to a substance abuse program in prison (see People v. Ramos, 171 AD3d 483, 484 [1st Dept 2019], lv denied 33 NY3d 912 [2019]; People v. Greene, 154 AD3d 583 [1st Dept 2017], lv denied 30 NY3d 913 [2018]).
The record supports the court's upward departure to level two. Clear and convincing evidence established aggravating factors not adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument (see generally People v. Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861–862 [2014]), “which assessed points based on the mere existence of certain prior convictions but did not sufficiently reflect the egregious pattern and risk of recidivism reflected in defendant's criminal background” (People v. Carmona, 212 AD3d 537, 537 [1st Dept 2023]; see People v. Taylor, 154 AD3d 524 [1st Dept 2017], lv denied 30 NY3d 909 [2018]). Defendant committed the underlying crime after he had already been convicted three times of the same type of sex crime and after he had previously been adjudicated a level two offender. These aggravating factors also outweighed the unexceptional mitigating factors cited by defendant.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 52
Decided: April 18, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)