Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Claudia IMBERT, Petitioner–Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, et al., Respondents–Respondents.
Judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Tuitt, J.), entered April 27, 2022, which denied a petition challenging respondent New York State Public Employment Relations Board's (PERB) determination, dated August 23, 2021, denying petitioner's unfair practice charge against petitioner's union, respondent United Federation of Teachers (UFT), and granted respondents’ motions to dismiss the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
PERB's determination that UFT did not breach its duty of fair representation to petitioner by declining to take petitioner's line-of-duty-injury (LODI) grievance to arbitration was not irrational (see Matter of Poughkeepsie Professional Firefighters’ Assn., Local 596, IAFF, AFL–CIO–CLC v New York State Pub. Empl. Relations Bd., 6 NY3d 514, 522 [2006]). UFT decided not to arbitrate petitioner's grievance based on undisputed evidence that petitioner was not between work assignments when she was struck by a car but instead had completed her last assignment of the day and was on her way home, as well as the driver's statement that petitioner was using her cellphone when crossing the street. Given the Department of Education's criteria for LODI status requiring that the employee be “injured while performing duties connected with [her] assignment” and that the injury “could not have been foreseen or avoided with ordinary care by the injured employee” (Personnel Memorandum # 4), UFT's decision was not so outside the “wide range of reasonableness” afforded to unions in their representation of members as to be arbitrary (Matter of Civil Serv. Bar Assn., Local 237 Intl. v City of New York, 99 A.D.2d 264, 272–273 [1st Dept 1984], affd 64 N.Y.2d 188 [1984]).
Contrary to petitioner's arguments, the merits of her LODI claim are not before this Court. Because PERB's decision on petitioner's fair representation claim has a rational basis, this Court must affirm (see Matter of Uniformed Firefighters Assn. of Greater N.Y. v City of New York, 114 AD3d 510, 514 [1st Dept 2014], lv denied 23 NY3d 904 [2014]).
PERB's determination upholding the ALJ's decision not to order UFT to produce its arbitration statistics was also not irrational, since it was consistent with PERB's rules limiting the availability of discovery in improper practice charge disputes (see Rochester Teachers Assn., 45 PERB ¶ 3033, 3079 [2012]).
We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 17583
Decided: March 28, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)