Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. MAKIESHA D. HAWKINS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice by reducing the sentence of imprisonment imposed on each of counts 1 through 8 to a determinate term of three years, and as modified the judgment is affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon a nonjury verdict of four counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]), five counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (§ 220.16 [1]), and two counts of criminally using drug paraphernalia in the first degree (§ 220.55).
Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of counts 1 through 4 of the indictment in this nonjury trial (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349 [2007]), we reject defendant's contention that the verdict with respect to those counts is against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]).
We agree with defendant, however, that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe, and we therefore modify the judgment as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]) by reducing the sentence on each of counts 1 through 8 to a determinate term of imprisonment of three years, to be followed by the two years of postrelease supervision imposed by County Court, which thereby produces an aggregate term of imprisonment of 12 years.
Entered: March 24, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 138
Decided: March 24, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)