Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. ADAM BURGIO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). As defendant correctly concedes, he failed to preserve for our review his contentions that a downward departure was warranted on the bases of, inter alia, his significant adult relationship with his wife, probationary sentence, and response to mental health treatment, inasmuch as he did not assert those grounds for a downward departure at the SORA hearing (see People v Burgess, 191 AD3d 1256, 1256-1257 [4th Dept 2021]; People v Colon, 186 AD3d 1730, 1731 [2d Dept 2020], lv denied 36 NY3d 903 [2020]). In any event, defendant's contentions lack merit. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant “satisfied his burden with respect to the first two steps of the three-step analysis required in evaluating a request for a downward departure,” we conclude that Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's request (People v Cornwell, — AD3d —, —, 2023 NY Slip Op 00566, *1 [4th Dept 2023]; see People v Pritchard, — AD3d —, —, 2023 NY Slip Op 00549, *1 [4th Dept 2023]; see generally People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]). Upon weighing the mitigating circumstances against the aggravating circumstances, including “ ‘the quantity and nature of the child pornography used by defendant, ․ and the extremely young children depicted therein’ ” (People v Varin, 158 AD3d 1311, 1312 [4th Dept 2018], lv denied 31 NY3d 905 [2018]), we conclude that the totality of the circumstances does not warrant a downward departure inasmuch as “defendant's presumptive risk level does not represent an over-assessment of his dangerousness and risk of sexual recidivism” (Burgess, 191 AD3d at 1257; see generally People v Sincerbeaux, 27 NY3d 683, 690-691 [2016]).
Entered: March 24, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 158
Decided: March 24, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)