Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
CHRISTINA M. WESTERMEYER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PAUL A. WHELAN AND LORI A. WHELAN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking to recover damages for injuries she sustained when she fell after stepping off the front stoop of a home owned by defendants. Plaintiff appeals from an order that granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We affirm.
Defendants met their initial burden by submitting evidence establishing that there was no dangerous or defective condition existing on the property at the location where plaintiff fell and that the stoop “was in compliance with the applicable codes” (Corbett v Adelphia W. N.Y. Holdings, LLC, 45 AD3d 1293, 1294 [4th Dept 2007]; see Mann v Autozone Northeast, Inc., 148 AD3d 1646, 1646 [4th Dept 2017]; Zammiello v Senpike Mall Co., 300 AD2d 1124, 1125 [4th Dept 2002]). We reject plaintiff's contention that she raised a triable issue of fact in opposition by submitting the affidavit of an expert stating that the area where she fell presented a hazard (see Corbett, 45 AD3d at 1294; see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Plaintiff's expert affidavit was conclusory and speculative and, therefore, insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact whether a dangerous condition existed (see DiStefano v Ulta Salon, 95 AD3d 932, 933 [2d Dept 2012]; see generally Ciccarelli v Cotira, Inc., 24 AD3d 1276, 1277 [4th Dept 2005]). In any event, “[e]ven if an expert alludes to potential defects ․, the plaintiff still must establish that the ․ fall was connected to the supposed defect, absent which summary judgment is appropriate” (Corbett, 45 AD3d at 1294 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Here, plaintiff failed to establish that any of the alleged defects caused her to fall (see id. at 1295; see also Mann, 148 AD3d at 1646). Indeed, plaintiff submitted her deposition testimony, wherein she stated that she was caused to step off of the stoop as a result of the front door opening: in other words, not as a result of any dangerous or defective condition on the property.
Entered: March 17, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 22
Decided: March 17, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)