Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: TARA MCSHANLEY, PETITIONER, v. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, RESPONDENT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wayne County [John B. Nesbitt, A.J.], entered May 13, 2022) to review a determination of respondent. The determination denied petitioner's request that a report maintained in the New York State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment, indicating petitioner for abuse and maltreatment, be amended to unfounded.
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to review a determination made after a fair hearing that, inter alia, denied her request to amend to unfounded as against her an indicated report of abuse for allowing a sex offense to be committed against her older daughter (see 18 NYCRR 432.1 [a] [3]) and of maltreatment for impairing the emotional condition of her older daughter and her younger daughter (see 18 NYCRR 432.1 [b] [1] [ii]) and to seal that report (see Social Services Law § 422 [8] [a] [v]; [c] [ii]). Contrary to petitioner's contention, we conclude on the record before us that “the determination that [the Wayne County Department of Social Services] established by a fair preponderance of the evidence at the fair hearing that petitioner [abused her older daughter and] maltreated the subject children and that such [abuse and] maltreatment w[ere] relevant and reasonably related to childcare employment is supported by substantial evidence” (Matter of Dawn M. v New York State Cent. Register of Child Abuse & Maltreatment, 138 AD3d 1492, 1494 [4th Dept 2016]). We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and conclude that they lack merit.
Entered: February 3, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 928
Decided: February 03, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)