Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ANNASTASIA P. Erie County Department of Social Services, Petitioner-Respondent; v. Kirstin P., Respondent-Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, respondent mother appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition that, inter alia, adjudged that she neglected the subject child. Contrary to the mother's contention, petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that she neglected the child (see § 1046 [b] [i]). Here, petitioner established that the mother admitted to using cocaine during her pregnancy with the child, that the mother's hospital records indicated that she tested positive for cocaine during her pregnancy and had a history of polysubstance abuse, that the mother tested positive for cocaine less than three months after the child's birth, and that she refused to provide a urine sample on four other occasions (see § 1046 [a] [iii]; Matter of Noah C. [Greg C.], 192 A.D.3d 1676, 1677-1678, 145 N.Y.S.3d 266 [4th Dept. 2021]; Matter of Kenneth C. [Terri C.], 145 A.D.3d 1612, 1613, 43 N.Y.S.3d 819 [4th Dept. 2016], lv denied 29 N.Y.3d 905, 2017 WL 1574355 [2017]; Matter of Benicio H. [Charlene H.], 115 A.D.3d 857, 858, 982 N.Y.S.2d 338 [2d Dept. 2014]).
Insofar as the mother further contends that her participation in a drug treatment program is sufficient to bring this matter within the statutory exception for parents who are “voluntarily and regularly participating in a recognized rehabilitative program” (Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [iii]), we reject that contention. There is no evidence that the mother's participation in the treatment program is voluntary (see Matter of Hailey W., 42 A.D.3d 943, 944, 839 N.Y.S.2d 644 [4th Dept. 2007], lv denied 9 N.Y.3d 812, 846 N.Y.S.2d 602, 877 N.E.2d 652 [2007]; Matter of Amber DD., 26 A.D.3d 689, 690, 809 N.Y.S.2d 657 [3d Dept. 2006]).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 700
Decided: October 08, 2021
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)