Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

IN RE: WILLIAMSVIILE RESIDENTS OPPOSED TO BLOCHER REDEVELOPMENT (2022)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

IN RE: WILLIAMSVIILE RESIDENTS OPPOSED TO BLOCHER REDEVELOPMENT, LLC, CHRISTINE HUNT, DANIEL HUNT, RICHARD CUMMINGS, KATHLEEN CUMMINGS, REBECCA WALSER, RUDOLPH HEIN, WILLIAM HEIN, DIANE HEIN AND VICTORIA D'ANGELO, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, v. VILLAGE OF WILLIAMSVILLE PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD, VILLAGE OF WILLIAMSVILLE, NEW YORK, THE BLOCHER HOMES, INC., AND PEOPLE, INC., RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

MOTION NO. (634 /22) CA 21-01052.

Decided: December 23, 2022

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

Motion for reargument denied.

Was this helpful?

Thank you for your feedback!

FindLaw Marketing Authority Suite

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network

IN RE: WILLIAMSVIILE RESIDENTS OPPOSED TO BLOCHER REDEVELOPMENT (2022)

Docket No: MOTION NO. (634 /22) CA 21-01052.

Decided: December 23, 2022

Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Need to Find an Attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

For Legal Professionals

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign Up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Go to Learn About The Law

Need to Find an Attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

Copied to clipboard