Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Larry BENNETT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment of conviction under docket number 2014BX025869 (Kim A. Wilson, J.), rendered January 22, 2015, affirmed. Appeal from judgments of conviction under docket numbers 2014BX035135 and 2014BX037081 (Kim A. Wilson, J.), rendered January 22, 2015, dismissed as academic.
In view of defendant's knowing waiver of the right to prosecution by information, the facial sufficiency of the accusatory instruments must be assessed under the standard required of a misdemeanor complaint (see People v. Dumay, 23 NY3d 518, 522 [2014]). So viewed, the instrument under docket number 2014BX025869 was jurisdictionally valid because the factual allegations provide reasonable cause to believe that defendant was guilty of criminal sale of marijuana in the fourth-degree (see Penal Law § 221.40) by alleging, in relevant part, that at a specified time and street location, an undercover officer handed defendant ten dollars in prerecorded buy money in exchange for one ziplock bag containing marijuana (see People v. Roman, 60 Misc 3d 127[A], 2018 NY Slip Op 50916[U][App Term, 1st Dept 2018], lv denied 32 NY3d 941 [2018]). These allegations were sufficient for pleading purposes since they provided adequate notice to enable defendant to prepare a defense and invoke his protection against double jeopardy (see People v. Kasse, 22 NY3d 1142 [2014]). Any question regarding how the police identified defendant as the perpetrator was a matter to be raised at trial, not by insistence that the instrument was jurisdictionally defective (see People v. Konieczny, 2 NY3d 569, 577 [2004]).
Defendant's convictions of criminal possession of marijuana in the fifth degree (see Penal Law § 221.10) under docket numbers 2014BX035135 and 2014BX037081 have been automatically “vacated and dismissed” and rendered “legally invalid,” by operation of CPL 160.50(5), which became effective on August 28, 2019. Thus, this appeal from said convictions must be dismissed as academic (see People v. Taite, 65 Misc 3d 137[A], 2019 NY Slip Op 51671[U][App Term, 1st Dept 2019], lv denied 34 NY3d 1082 [2019]).
Per Curiam.
All concur
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 15-302
Decided: January 15, 2021
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)