Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Warren SINGLETON, Defendant–Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond L. Bruce, J.), entered on or about September 17, 2014, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 [2014] ). Defendant does not dispute that his prior second-degree robbery subjected him to a 30–point assessment for having committed a violent felony as defined by statute. Instead, he argues that a downward departure is warranted because the conviction was based on only his being “aided by another” (Penal Law § 160.10[1] ), and that the lack of actual violence involved is a mitigating factor not adequately accounted for in the risk assessment instrument. However, that type of robbery is inherently violent, because it necessarily involves “forcible stealing” (Penal Law § 160.00), and the participation of more than one robber poses “a threat of additional violence” (People v. Dennis, 146 A.D.2d 708, 708, 537 N.Y.S.2d 204 [2d Dept. 1989], affd 75 N.Y.2d 821, 552 N.Y.S.2d 559, 551 N.E.2d 1237 [1990]; see also People v. Sanchez, 13 N.Y.3d 554, 565, 893 N.Y.S.2d 803, 921 N.E.2d 570 [2009] ). In any event, this alleged mitigating factor, taken together with the other mitigating factors cited by defendant, are outweighed by several aggravating factors.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 12811
Decided: January 07, 2021
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)