Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Vincent DEL GROSSO, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. JIMMY JAZZ STATEN ISLAND, LLC, Defendant,
General Growth Properties Inc., et al., Defendants–Appellants GGP Staten Island initially sued herein as General Growth Properties, Inc. et al, Third–Party Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. All–Rite Construction Company, Inc. et al., Third–Party Defendants–Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene P. Bluth, J.), entered November 19, 2019, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the motion of third-party defendant K & R Electric Company, Inc. (K & R) to compel plaintiff to provide authorizations for his substance abuse and mental health treatment records and denied plaintiff's cross-motion for a protective order precluding disclosure of those records, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff alleges that as a result of an accident in which an object fell on his head from above, he sustained, as relevant here, a traumatic brain injury with resulting cognitive impairments and experienced post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, mood swings, loss of sense of self, and anxiety, among other things. The motion court providently exercised its discretion when it directed disclosure of plaintiff's substance abuse and mental health treatment records. Plaintiff put his mental condition in issue such that the interests of justice significantly outweighed the need to maintain confidentiality of those records by alleging that he sustained cognitive and psychological injuries impairments (see Castro v. Admar Supply Co., Inc., 159 A.D.3d 1616, 1619, 70 N.Y.S.3d 442 [4th Dept. 2018]; Rothstein v. Huh, 60 A.D.3d 839, 839, 875 N.Y.S.2d 250 [2d Dept. 2009]; Rosen v. MHM Realty LLC, 166 A.D.3d 428, 88 N.Y.S.3d 1 [1st Dept. 2018]; see generally Mental Hygiene Law § 33.13[c][1]; cf. Del Terzo v. Hospital for Special Surgery, 95 A.D.3d 551, 944 N.Y.S.2d 79 [1st Dept. 2012]; Gough v. Panorama Windows Ltd., 133 A.D.3d 526, 19 N.Y.S.3d 169 [1st Dept. 2015]).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 12769N
Decided: January 05, 2021
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)