Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
229 WEST 109 STREET REALTY CORP., Petitioner-Landlord-Appellant, v. Koji ICHIDA and Seiko Ichida, Respondents-Tenants, Masuo Ichida, Respondent-Undertenant-Respondent, John Doe and Jane Doe, Respondents-Undertenants.
Order (Michelle D. Schreiber, J.), dated December 4, 2018, reversed, with $10 costs, respondents' cross motion denied, petition reinstated, motion to amend the caption and petition granted, and the matter remanded to Civil Court for further proceedings consistent herewith. Appeal from order (Michelle D. Schreiber, J.), dated April 29, 2019, dismissed, without costs, as academic.
Landlord had no obligation to join the estate of the deceased tenant, Koji Ichida, as a party. Where, as here, premises are leased to a husband and wife, they take possession as tenants by the entirety (see EPTL 6-2.2[b]), with each spouse having a right of survivorship (see V.R.W., Inc. v. Klein, 68 NY2d 560, 564 [1986]). Thus, upon the death of Kochi Ichida, his interest did not pass to his estate, rather, it passed automatically to his wife, respondent-tenant Seiko Ichida (see PHH Mtge. Corp. v. Burt, 176 AD3d 1242, 1244 [2019]). Therefore, the estate of the deceased tenant is not a necessary party (see PHH Mtge. Corp. v Burt, 176 AD3d at 1244; cf. Joint Props. Owners v. Deri, 113 AD2d 691, 693-694 [1986]; Westway Plaza Assoc. v. Doe, 179 AD2d 408 [1992]). Accordingly, respondents' cross motion to dismiss for failure to join the deceased tenant's estate should have been denied and petitioner's motion to amend should have been granted.
To the extent the court believed that the surviving tenant was incapable of defending her rights, the remedy is to appoint a guardian ad litem (see CPLR 1201). We remand for further proceedings on this issue.
In reinstating the petition for a determination on the merits, we reach no other issue.
Per Curiam.
All concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 570078 /20
Decided: May 18, 2020
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)