BPP ST OWNER LLC v. JACKSON (2020)

Final judgment (Gary F. Marton, J.), entered April 26, 2019, affirmed, with $25 costs.

The trial court's determination that respondent Jackson, the daughter of the rent stabilized tenant, failed to meet her affirmative obligation to establish succession rights to the subject apartment (see Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] § 2523.5[b][1]), represents a fair interpretation of the evidence and is not disturbed (see 318 E. 93 v. Ward, 276 AD2d 277 [2000]; Claridge Gardens v. Menotti, 160 AD2d 544 [1990]). The trial court was warranted in concluding that respondent failed to establish that she primarily resided with her mother at the subject premises for the two years prior to her mother's June 30, 2016 vacatur, given the extensive documentary evidence establishing that respondent lived and worked in California during much of this period and the court's finding that respondent's testimony regarding her use of the apartment was "in the main, not credible."

The court providently exercised its discretion in denying respondent's request to adjourn, made at the commencement of the trial, after her newly retained counsel withdrew (see generally Yuliano v. Yuliano, 175 AD3d 1354, 1357 [2019]). Respondent, who had representation for most of this litigation (pending since October 2016), discharged her Legal Aid attorney after the trial date had been set by the Court, and, despite ample time to retain new counsel, did not secure new representation until a few days before trial was to commence.

Nor does the record disclose any evidentiary error warranting reversal.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

Per Curiam.

All concur.