Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Wesley FRANCOIS, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (April A. Newbauer, J.), rendered February 16, 2017, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 11/212 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.
This conviction arises out of an altercation that occurred when defendant allegedly attempted to deprive the victim of money in her possession. On appeal, defendant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain a guilty verdict, and that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. Since defendant failed to preserve the issue of legal sufficiency, we decline to review that issue in the interest of justice (see People v. Graves, 171 A.D.3d 674, 99 N.Y.S.3d 36 [1st Dept. 2019], lv denied 33 N.Y.3d 1069, 105 N.Y.S.3d 36, 129 N.E.3d 356 [2019]; People v. Carter, 46 A.D.3d 376, 847 N.Y.S.2d 572 [1st Dept. 2007], lv denied 10 N.Y.3d 838, 859 N.Y.S.2d 398, 889 N.E.2d 85 [2008]).
When determining whether a verdict is against the weight of the evidence, “great deference is accorded to the factfinder's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony and observe demeanor” (People v. Mateo, 2 N.Y.3d 383, 410, 779 N.Y.S.2d 399, 811 N.E.2d 1053 [2004]). Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence and find no basis to disturb the jury's credibility determinations. The victim, who was 67 years old, stated that defendant, who was decades younger than she, grabbed her by her shoulders and forced her to sit down on the stairs leading to the subway. He then attempted to take money from her closed fist. She testified that as a result of defendant's actions, she sustained pain “in the lower rump” and described the pain as “hard and strong.” The victim also testified that defendant scratched her hand, and when asked if she had any pain in her hand at the time she replied, “Yes, it was a burning, burning sensation.” Thus, there was a reasonable view of the evidence that defendant, by grabbing the victim, forcing her to sit down on concrete, and prying money from her hand, engaged in conduct that tended to cause physical injury to a person who is 65 years of age or older (see Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.05[12]).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 11208
Decided: March 05, 2020
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)