Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: NATIONAL FUEL GAS SUPPLY CORPORATION, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Ivan GUROV, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondents.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the order is stayed in accordance with the following memorandum: In appeal No. 1, respondent Ivan Gurov appeals from an order that, inter alia, granted the petition and authorized petitioner to acquire an easement over his property. In appeal No. 2, respondents Emily R. Oprea and Grace R. Page, as trustees for the Roderick Family Trust, appeal from an order of the same court that, inter alia, granted the petition and authorized petitioner to acquire an easement over their property. The outcome of these appeals hinges on, inter alia, the validity of the State of New York's denial of petitioner's application for a water quality certification (WQC) (see Matter of National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. v. Schueckler, 167 A.D.3d 128, 129–139, 88 N.Y.S.3d 305 [4th Dept. 2018] ). The validity of that denial, however, is currently unclear and is being actively litigated in multiple proceedings before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Under these circumstances, and in the interest of judicial economy, we hold these cases and reserve decision pending determination of the validity of the denial of petitioner's application for a WQC (see Buffalo United Charter Sch. v. New York State Pub. Empl. Relations Bd., 107 A.D.3d 1437, 1438, 965 N.Y.S.2d 905 [4th Dept. 2013], lv dismissed 22 N.Y.3d 1082, 981 N.Y.S.2d 666, 4 N.E.3d 967 [2014] ). Furthermore, in the exercise of our discretion, we stay the orders appealed from pending our ultimate disposition of these appeals (see CPLR 5519[c]; Sternberg v. New York Water Serv. Corp., 94 A.D.2d 723, 723, 462 N.Y.S.2d 609 [2d Dept. 1983] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 59
Decided: January 31, 2020
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)