Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ELIZABETH L., Petitioner–Respondent, v. KEVIN O., Respondent–Appellant.
Order, Family Court, New York County (Patria Frias–Colon, J.), entered on or about September 25, 2018, which, upon a finding that respondent father willfully violated a court order mandating child support payments, sentenced him to incarceration for a term of six months to be served on weekends, set the purge amount at $10,000, and set the arrears at $55,549.37, unanimously modified, on the facts, to the extent of crediting payments actually made and setting the amount of arrears at $50,482.31, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from so much of the order that committed the father to the custody of the New York City Department of Corrections and from that part of the order that confirmed the Support Magistrate's finding of willful violation of the order of support, unanimously dismissed, without costs.
The appeal from that part of the order of commitment that committed the father to the custody of the Department of Corrections for a period of six months unless he paid the purge amount is dismissed as academic, as the period of incarceration has expired (see Matter of Schad v. Schad, 158 A.D.3d 705, 70 N.Y.S.3d 568 [2d Dept. 2018]). Furthermore, the father's appeal from the finding of willful violation made by the Support Magistrate and confirmed by Family Court must likewise be dismissed, inasmuch as the Support Magistrate's finding was made upon the father's default, and the father did not move before the Support Magistrate to vacate the default (Family Ct. Act § 439[e]; Matter of Reaves v. Jones, 110 A.D.3d 1276, 1277, 975 N.Y.S.2d 186 [3d Dept. 2013]).
In any event, the court properly confirmed the Support Magistrate's finding that the father willfully violated the support order. Failure to pay support, as ordered, constitutes prima facie evidence of a willful violation (see Family Ct. Act § 454[3][a]). The burden then shifted to the father to present “some competent, credible evidence of his inability to make the required payments” (Matter of Powers v. Powers, 86 N.Y.2d 63, 70, 629 N.Y.S.2d 984, 653 N.E.2d 1154 [1995]). The father did not meet this burden because he failed to appear before the Support Magistrate and present evidence (see Matter of Jennifer D. v. Artise C.J., 154 A.D.3d 578, 62 N.Y.S.3d 346 [1st Dept. 2017]). His later arguments before the court were insufficient and improper.
However, in calculating the amount of arrears owed, the court failed to credit the father $5,067.06 in payments made. Accordingly, the arrears are set at $50,482.31.
We have considered the father's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 10678
Decided: January 02, 2020
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)