Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
53-63 PARTNERS, L.P., Petitioner-Landlord-Appellant, v. Regina PAEZ, Respondent-Tenant-Respondent, and “John Doe” and “Jane Doe,” Respondents-Undertenants.
Order (Heela D. Capell, J.), dated May 18, 2018, affirmed, with $ 10 costs.
This holdover proceeding, premised upon allegations that the rent stabilized tenant breached her lease by failing to maintain her section 8 benefits (see generally Rosario v. Diagonal Realty, LLC, 8 NY3d 755 [2007], cert denied 552 US 1141 [2008]), was properly dismissed on tenant's motion. The documentary evidence establishes that tenant's section 8 subsidy was subsequently reinstated. In the circumstances, we agree that the eviction remedy sought by landlord does not lie (see DU 1st Realty Co. LP v. Robinson, 35 Misc 3d 138[A], 2012 NY Slip Op 50840[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2012]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Per Curiam.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 570089 /19
Decided: May 31, 2019
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)