Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Bernell GOULD, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered April 22, 2016, resentencing defendant upon an April 22, 1991 conviction, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of four to eight years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant contends that his 1988 conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, which was under the alias Gerald Francis, could not serve as a proper predicate for his second violent felony offender adjudication on the instant resentencing on his 1991 attempted first-degree robbery conviction, because the sentence on the 1988 conviction was invalid as a matter of law. Specifically, he claims he was improperly adjudicated a first felony offender, when he should have been adjudicated a second felony offender. He urges this Court to vacate the current sentence, and remand the case for further resentencing.
Defendant's request is foreclosed by the recent decision of the Court of Appeals in People v. Thomas, ––– N.Y.3d ––––, 2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 01167 [February 19, 2019]. In Thomas, the Court held that “the date on which sentence was first imposed upon a prior conviction—not the date of any subsequent resentencings on that same conviction—is the relevant date for [predicate felony] purposes” (2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 01167, *1).
Moreover, defendant's contention regarding the 1988 conviction is at odds with his contention on a prior appeal (131 A.D.3d 874, 16 N.Y.S.3d 725 [1st Dept. 2015] ), where he argued that, on the same 1991 conviction at issue here, he should be resentenced as a second violent felony offender, rather than a second felony offender, based on the 1988 conviction. He should not now be allowed to challenge the use of the 1988 conviction as a predicate, which was the basis for his prior successful appeal.
In any event, “a sentencing defect does not invalidate a prior conviction for purposes of adjudicating [a] defendant's subsequent felony offender status” (People v. Ashley, 71 A.D.3d 1286, 1287, 896 N.Y.S.2d 520 [3d Dept. 2010], affd on other grounds 16 N.Y.3d 725, 917 N.Y.S.2d 91, 942 N.E.2d 300 [2011]; see People ex rel. Emanuel v. McMann, 7 N.Y.2d 342, 345, 197 N.Y.S.2d 174, 165 N.E.2d 187 [1960] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 8241
Decided: March 21, 2019
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)