SCOTT v. 101 (2019)

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Erika M. Edwards, J.), entered August 29, 2017, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant September 24th Street LLC's motion for summary judgment reforming the contract of sale and ordering specific performance of the reformed contract, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that the price contained in the contract of sale was the result of a scrivener's error and did not reflect the price upon which the parties had agreed before reducing their agreement to writing (see Nash v. Kornblum, 12 N.Y.2d 42, 234 N.Y.S.2d 697, 186 N.E.2d 551 [1962] ).  The affidavit by defendant's counsel's legal assistant shows the agreed-upon price and that the price was incorrectly transcribed into the contract.  Moreover, the record shows defendant's asking price, plaintiff's first offer, which was well above the price contained in the contract, the parties' negotiations, which all involved figures higher than that contained in the contract, and the deal sheet, which reflected the agreed-upon price.

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.