2232 2240 ACP OWNER LLC v. TEARDROPS OF ELEGANCE INC (2022)

Order (Jose A. Padilla, Jr., J.), entered March 1, 2022, affirmed, without costs.

We find no abuse of discretion in the denial of respondent's application for posteviction relief in this commercial nonpayment proceeding (see 52 Hamilton Place NYC Corp. v Araman, 57 Misc 3d 152(A), 2017 NY Slip Op 51584(U) [App Term, 1st Dept 2017]). Restoration relief is unavailable because four years have elapsed since the eviction and a new tenant is in possession, who has not been made a party to this proceeding (see Eight Assoc. v Hynes, 102 AD2d 746, 748 [1984], affd 65 NY2d 739 [1985]). In any event, respondent failed to establish good cause for the relief sought, since she failed to comply with the terms of four stipulations of settlement, and has neither alleged nor shown that she has paid any portion of the substantial rental arrears that have accrued (see RPAPL 749(3); see also Matter of 1621 St. Nicholas Ave Owners LLC v Cruz, 146 AD3d 409, 410 [2017]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

Per Curiam.

All concur.