Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Hanson CUTHBERT, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. FOREIGN DEVELOPMENT SERVICE, LTD., et al., Defendants–Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered on or about May 12, 2017, which granted defendants' motion to renew and reargue their prior motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and, upon reargument, granted the motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff seeks damages for injuries he sustained when one of the cellar doors he had opened to take garbage up to the sidewalk from the restaurant where he was employed snapped back and struck him on the back of the head.
The court providently exercised its discretion in granting defendants' motion for renewal and reargument of their prior motion for summary judgment so that they could submit a lease extension to which they had referred in their initial moving papers but which they had inadvertently failed to attach to the papers (see CPLR 2001). The lease extension demonstrated that the lease was in effect on the date of plaintiff's accident and that plaintiff had received it before defendants brought their motion; thus, its consideration caused no prejudice to plaintiff.
Although defendant Foreign Development Service, Ltd. was an out-of-possession landlord with the right to reenter the leased premises to inspect or repair, the alleged defect in the cellar doors, i.e., rusty hinges and no device, such as a bar, to hold the doors open, was not a structural defect contrary to a specific statutory safety provision (see Almanzar v. Picasso's Clothing, 281 A.D.2d 341, 723 N.Y.S.2d 11 [1st Dept. 2001]; Bing v. 296 Third Ave. Group, L.P., 94 A.D.3d 413, 414, 941 N.Y.S.2d 141 [1st Dept. 2012], lv denied 19 N.Y.3d 815, 2012 WL 5308073 [2012]; Baez v. Barnard Coll., 71 A.D.3d 585, 898 N.Y.S.2d 29 [1st Dept. 2010] ). Defendant Nelson Management Group, Ltd., the managing agent, managed only the floors of residential apartments above the restaurant and had no control over the restaurant's space.
We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 6700
Decided: May 29, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)