Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Odisseas Konstantakopoulos, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Defendant–Respondent. Index No.
E
Case No.2020–03339
Law Office of Craig A. Blumberg, New York (Craig A. Blumberg of counsel), for appellant.
Gold Benes, LLP, Bellmore (James Stewart of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ruben Franco, J.), entered July 10, 2020, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment declaring that there was no coverage for the subject fire loss under the insurance policy it issued to plaintiff, and so declared, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant demonstrated that plaintiff's insurance application contained a material misrepresentation, voiding the policy ab initio (see Insurance Law § 3105[b][1]; Starr Indem. & Liab. Co. v. Monte Carlo, LLC, 190 AD3d 441 [1st Dept 2021] ). The underwriter's affidavit and excerpts from the underwriting guidelines show that defendant would not have issued the policy if it had known the true nature of the risk, i.e., a four-unit dwelling as opposed to a three-unit dwelling and an ongoing eviction proceeding. Defendant was not required to submit evidence of its underwriting practices with respect to applicants with similar histories (see Arch Specialty Ins. Co. v. Kam Cheung Constr., Inc., 104 AD3d 599, 599 [1st Dept 2013] ).
The fact that the increase in premium for a four-unit dwelling was related to liability coverage, as opposed to property coverage, is not relevant to the determination of materiality (see Greene v. United Mut. Life Ins. Co., 38 Misc.2d 728, 730–731 [Sup Ct, Bronx County 1963], affd 23 A.D.2d 720 [1st Dept 1965], lv denied 16 N.Y.2d 482 [1965] ). Nor is there ambiguity in the phrase “eviction proceedings.” Even if plaintiff thought his eviction proceeding did not qualify as an eviction proceeding for purposes of the question asked on the insurance application, a misrepresentation need not be fraudulent to be material (see Tennenbaum v. Insurance Corp. of Ireland, 179 A.D.2d 589, 592 [1st Dept 1992] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 1389 2
Decided: May 20, 2021
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)