Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. ODYSSTY D. REED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [4]), defendant contends that County Court erred in failing to determine whether he should be afforded youthful offender status. We agree. Because defendant was convicted of an armed felony offense (see CPL 1.20 [41]), he is ineligible to receive a youthful offender adjudication unless the court determines that one of two mitigating factors is present (see CPL 720.10 [2] [a] [ii]; [3]). If the court, in its discretion, determines that neither of the mitigating factors is present and states the reason for its determination on the record, then no further determination on the youthful offender application is required (see People v Middlebrooks, 25 NY3d 516, 527 [2015]; People v Jones, 155 AD3d 1547, 1552 [4th Dept 2017], amended on rearg 156 AD3d 1493 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 32 NY3d 1205 [2019]). If, however, the court determines that one or more of those mitigating factors are present, and that defendant is therefore an eligible youth, it must then determine whether defendant is a youthful offender (see Middlebrooks, 25 NY3d at 527; People v Dukes, 147 AD3d 1534, 1535 [4th Dept 2017]).
Here, the court did not follow the procedure set forth in Middlebrooks, inasmuch as it made no on-the-record determination of defendant's eligibility for a youthful offender adjudication at sentencing (see People v Gonzalez, 171 AD3d 1502, 1503 [4th Dept 2019]). Consequently, we hold the case, reserve decision, and remit the matter to County Court “to make and state for the record ‘a determination of whether defendant is a youthful offender’ ” (People v Wilson, 151 AD3d 1836, 1837 [4th Dept 2017], quoting People v Rudolph, 21 NY3d 497, 503 [2013]).
Entered: March 19, 2021
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 213
Decided: March 19, 2021
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)