Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: S.H. and Another, Children Under Eighteen Years of Age etc. Patricia W., Respondent–Appellant, v. Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Passidomo, J.), entered on or about January 23, 2018, to the extent it brings up for review a fact-finding order, same court and Judge, entered on or about December 13, 2017, which found that respondent mother neglected the subject children, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from fact-finding order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the order of disposition.
The findings of neglect were supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct. Act § 1012[f][i][B]; § 1046[b][i] ). Such evidence shows that the mother neglected the children by repeatedly placing her then 18–month–old daughter (J.) in the control of her nine-year-old son (S.) for brief periods of time while the children were sent to retrieve mail from the lobby of their building. S. had a history of emotional and behavioral issues that made this particularly inappropriate. Prior to the incident that led to S's. removal from the mother's home, the mother had failed to continue with recommended therapy for S. after his school disciplined him for offering to give a female classmate money for sex. In addition, the mother was aware that S. had engaged in dangerous and destructive behavior, including attempting to set fires, and had expressed extreme jealousy of J., even prompting him to write a letter to the mother expressing that he felt unloved. Despite this history and the fact that J. was just 18 months old and still learning to walk on stairs, on numerous occasions, the mother encouraged S. to walk with J. down multiple flights of stairs without adult supervision. On at least one of these occasions, S. engaged in sexual behavior with J. while alone with her in the building's elevator, which was discovered only after a building manager reviewed the elevator's surveillance video. Thus, the mother's judgment was so impaired as to expose J. to substantial risk of harm (see Matter of Serenity P. [Shameka P.], 74 A.D.3d 1855, 1856, 902 N.Y.S.2d 741 [4th Dept. 2010]). Furthermore, the mother failed to adequately address S.'s emotional and psychiatric needs, thereby adversely affecting his mental health and posing a risk to other children (see Matter of Sayeh R., 91 N.Y.2d 306, 315, 670 N.Y.S.2d 377, 693 N.E.2d 724 [1997]; see also Matter of Faridah W., 180 A.D.2d 451, 452, 579 N.Y.S.2d 377 [1st Dept. 1992], lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 751, 587 N.Y.S.2d 287, 599 N.E.2d 691 [1992]).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 10102-
Decided: October 17, 2019
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)