THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK RESPONDENT v. SHAMON BEDELL DEFENDANT APPELLANT (2019)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:  On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10[3] ), defendant contends that his plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered.  Defendant failed to preserve his contention for our review inasmuch as he did not move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction pursuant to CPL article 440 (see People v. Sheppard, 149 AD3d 1569, 1569 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 1133 [2017] ).  This case does not fall within the rare exception to the preservation doctrine inasmuch as nothing in the plea colloquy “casts significant doubt upon the defendant's guilt or otherwise calls into question the voluntariness of the plea” (People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 666 [1988] ).

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court