Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Mehki L.W., Catholic Guardian Services, Petitioner–Respondent, Keyara J., Respondent–Appellant.
Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Marcia Egger of counsel), attorney for the child.
_
Appeal from order, Family Court, New York County (Patria Frias–Colon, J.), entered on or about March 16, 2018, which denied respondent mother's motion to vacate a conditional surrender of the child, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.
Prior to the finalization of an adoption, where there is a substantial failure of a material condition of a surrender executed pursuant to Social Services Law (SSL) § 383–c, Family Court may rehear the matter sua sponte, or upon petition by the agency, parent or attorney for the child (see Family Court Act § 1055–a [a] ). Here, however, it appears that the adoption of the child was finalized during the pendency of this appeal. Thus, the parties' rights will not be directly affected by our determination on this issue, and it is therefore moot (see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714 [1980] ). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
In any event, we find that the Family Court properly denied the mother's motion to vacate the conditional surrender. Although petitioner complied with the statutory notice requirements, the mother waited over a year in moving to vacate the surrender after she knew or should have known of the substantial failure of a material condition, namely that the foster father would no longer be an adoptive resource for the child (see SSL § 383–c[6][c]; cf. Matter of Christopher F., 260 A.D.2d 97, 99–101 [3d Dept 1999] ). Moreover, it is undisputed that the mother failed to provide petitioner with her updated contact information, as required under the express terms of the judicial surrender (see SSL § 383–c[5][c][iii] ).
We have considered the parties' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 9759
Decided: June 27, 2019
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)