Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Robert ROSSI, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. 140 WEST JV MANAGER LLC, et al., Defendants–Appellants,
J.T. Magen & Company Inc., Defendant–Respondent. 140 West JV Manager LLC, et al., Third Party Plaintiff, v. H & L Electric, Inc., Third Party Defendant. [And Another Third–Party Action]
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert R. Reed, J.), entered on or about January 31, 2018, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability as to Labor Law § 241(6) predicated on violations of Industrial Code (12 NYCRR) §§ 23–1.7(e)(1) and (2) as against defendants 140 West Street (N.Y.), LLC, and Vanquish Contracting Corp. (Vanquish), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Summary judgment on the issue of liability was properly granted in this action where plaintiff was injured when he tripped and fell over construction debris at the work site. The area where plaintiff fell was, by definition, a passageway, as he tripped over Vanquish's demolition debris along the only route he could take to return to his work area with a ladder (see Lois v. Flintlock Constr. Servs., LLC, 137 A.D.3d 446, 447, 27 N.Y.S.3d 120 [1st Dept. 2016]; see also Harasim v. Eljin Constr. of N.Y., Inc., 106 A.D.3d 642, 643, 966 N.Y.S.2d 387 [1st Dept. 2013]; 12 NYCRR 23–1.7[e][1] ). Moreover, Vanquish left demolition debris on a floor where plaintiff was required to pass in the course of his work within the definition of a working area (see Canning v. Barneys N.Y., 289 A.D.2d 32, 34, 734 N.Y.S.2d 116 [1st Dept. 2001]; 12 NYCRR 23–1.7[e][2] ). The debris, consisting of cables from elevator shaft demolition, was not inherent in, or an integral part of, the work being performed by either plaintiff electrician or Vanquish at the time of the accident (see Pereira v. New Sch., 148 A.D.3d 410, 412, 48 N.Y.S.3d 391 [1st Dept. 2017] ), but rather constituted an accumulation of debris from which Vanquish was required to keep work areas free (see Lester v. JD Carlisle Dev. Corp., MD., 156 A.D.3d 577, 68 N.Y.S.3d 60 [1st Dept. 2017] ).
We decline to search the record to grant any party summary judgment on the Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence claims.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 9140
Decided: April 30, 2019
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)