Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
U.S. BANK N.A. as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2013 SC4 Legal Title Trust, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. The NASSAU COUNTY PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR, as Administrator of the Estate of Kathleen Bestany, Deceased, Defendant, 532 West 187 Realty, LLC, Defendant–Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo Hagler, J.), entered June 30, 2017, which granted defendant 532 West 187 Realty LLC's (532 West) motion to vacate the default judgment entered against it, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
We find that the motion court properly exercised its discretion pursuant to CPLR 317. Taken together, the affidavits submitted by 532 West established that it never received notice of the summons because its agent for service never forwarded the same to it (cf. John v. Arin Bainbridge Realty Corp., 147 A.D.3d 454, 455–456, 46 N.Y.S.3d 589 [1st Dept. 2017] ). Plaintiff does not dispute that the affidavits also established that 532 West did not otherwise have notice of the action. Further, there was no indication in the record that 532 West deliberately evaded service (cf. Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A.C. Dutton Lumber Co., 67 N.Y.2d 138, 141–143, 501 N.Y.S.2d 8, 492 N.E.2d 116 [1986] ). 532 West showed that it had a potentially meritorious defense to the foreclosure action by submitting a discharge of mortgage that stated that the subject mortgage had been satisfied (Reale v. Tsoukas, 146 A.D.3d 833, 835, 45 N.Y.S.3d 148 [2d Dept. 2017] ).
We decline to hear plaintiff's arguments, made for the first time on appeal, that the motion to vacate was untimely and that 532 West failed to establish its meritorious defense through an affidavit from an individual with knowledge of the facts.
We have considered the remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 9017
Decided: April 18, 2019
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)