Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Charlene WEISS, as Administrator of the Estate of Mark L. Weiss, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants–Respondents, The New Fulton Fish Market Cooperative at Hunts Point, Inc., Defendant–Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mitchell J. Danziger, J.), entered on or about March 5, 2018, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motion of defendant The New Fulton Fish Market Cooperative at Hunts Point, Inc. (Fulton) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In this action where plaintiff's decedent alleged that he was injured when he tripped and fell over broken cement barriers strewn over the sidewalk and roadway owned by defendant City of New York, Fulton failed to establish that maintenance of the accident location was not within its responsibilities under its lease with the City. Thus, Fulton did not demonstrate an absence of a duty of care owing to plaintiff's decedent (see Abramson v. Eden Farm, Inc., 70 A.D.3d 514, 894 N.Y.S.2d 429 [1st Dept. 2010] ).
In view of Fulton's failure to meet its prima facie burden, plaintiff's opposition papers need not be considered (see generally Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853, 487 N.Y.S.2d 316, 476 N.E.2d 642 [1985] ). In any event, while there was no direct evidence as to who caused the dangerous condition, issues of fact were raised by the circumstantial evidence as to the liability of each of the defendants (see e.g. Koeppel v. City of New York, 205 A.D.2d 402, 613 N.Y.S.2d 389 [1st Dept. 1994] ).
We have considered the remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 8784
Decided: March 26, 2019
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)