Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Evanna S., and Another, Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years etc., Omatee S., et al., Respondents–Appellants, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Respondent.
Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Susan Clement of counsel), attorney for the children.
_
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Clark V. Richardson, J.), entered on or about April 25, 2017, to the extent it brings up for review a fact-finding order, same court and Judge, entered on or about March 7, 2017, which found that respondent father and respondent mother neglected the subject children, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeals from fact-finding order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeals from the order of disposition.
The findings of neglect were supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Court Act 1046[b][i] ). The chronic unsanitary conditions of the mother and children's living space, including dirty diapers and feces strewn around the room, as well as the children's odor and unkempt appearance, were well documented in the record and demonstrated that the children were at imminent risk of impairment (see Matter of Nivek A.S. [Juanita S.] ), 148 AD3d 459 [1st Dept 2017] ). The mother also failed to provide the children with adequate nutrition and medical care, notwithstanding that the children's pediatrician identified the children's weight loss as an issue and prescribed a feeding plan (see id.). The mother also failed to heed the caseworker's advice to seek prompt medical attention for the children when they were seriously ill. Furthermore, the mother failed to comply with her service plan and attend required weekly therapy, and routinely exercised poor judgment in caring for herself and the children (see e.g. Matter of Viveca AA., 51 AD3d 1072, 1073 [3d Dept 2008].
The record supports a finding of neglect against the fatherin light of his untreated mental illness (see Matter of Enrique S. [Kelba S.], 134 AD3d 576 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 948 [2016] ), and failure to provide adequate care during the period that the children resided with him. The court also properly drew a negative inference from his failure to testify (see Matter of Zelda McM. [Patrick L.-O. McM.], 154 AD3d 573, 574 [1st Dept 2017] ).
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 8688– 8689– 8690
Decided: March 14, 2019
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)