Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. DAVID MOSCA, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On defendant's prior appeal from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of two counts of sodomy in the first degree (Penal Law former § 130.50[3] ), five counts of sodomy in the second degree (former § 130.45[1] ) and one count of endangering the welfare of a child (§ 260.10[1] ), all in connection with his sexual abuse of four boys, we modified the judgment by vacating the sentence on the conviction of sodomy in the first degree under count three of the indictment, and we remitted the matter for resentencing on that count (People v. Mosca, 294 A.D.2d 938, 939 [4th Dept 2002], lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 538 [2002] ). Defendant now appeals from a further resentence imposing a mandatory period of postrelease supervision with respect to the conviction of sodomy in the first degree under count one of the indictment.
Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that County Court was deprived of jurisdiction to resentence him by its failure to comply with the time limits set forth in Correction Law
§ 601–d (see People v. Manor, 134 AD3d 1400, 1401 [4th Dept 2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 967 [2016] ). We decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15[3][c] ). The resentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 16–01708
Decided: June 29, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)