GARY STIEGMAN PLAINTIFF APPELLANT RESPONDENT v. APPEAL NO (2018)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

GARY STIEGMAN, PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT–RESPONDENT, v. THE BARDEN & ROBESON CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS BARDEN HOMES, B & H CARPENTRY, DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS -APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

CA 17–01685

Decided: June 29, 2018

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

BROWN CHIARI LLP, BUFFALO (BRIAN R. HOGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT–RESPONDENT. RUPP BAASE PFALZGRAF CUNNINGHAM LLC, BUFFALO (THOMAS P. CUNNINGHAM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT–APPELLANT THE BARDEN & ROBESON CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESSAS BARDEN HOMES. OSBORN, REED & BURKE, LLP, ROCHESTER (JEFFREY P. DIPALMA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT–APPELLANT B & H CARPENTRY.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal and cross appeals are unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Stiegman v. The Barden & Robeson Corp. ( [appeal No. 2]—AD3d—[June 29, 2018] [4th Dept 2018] ).

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network