IN RE: ZANDER L. (2018)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:  In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384–b, respondent mother appeals from an order that revoked a suspended judgment and terminated her parental rights with respect to the subject child.  We affirm.

It is well established that, if Family Court “ ‘determines by a preponderance of the evidence that there has been noncompliance with any of the terms of the suspended judgment, the court may revoke the suspended judgment and terminate parental rights’ ” (Matter of Kh'Niayah D. [Niani J.], 155 A.D.3d 1649, 1650, 63 N.Y.S.3d 800 [4th Dept. 2017], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 901, 2018 WL 1414704 [2018];  see Matter of Ireisha P. [Shonita M.], 154 A.D.3d 1340, 1340–1341, 60 N.Y.S.3d 919 [4th Dept. 2017], lv denied 30 N.Y.3d 910, 2018 WL 773071 [2018] ).  Contrary to the mother's contention, petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that she failed to comply with the terms of the suspended judgment.  Indeed, the record establishes that the mother violated numerous terms of the suspended judgment, including requirements that she demonstrate safe and developmentally appropriate parenting practices, maintain adequate housing, and not have anyone else present during visits with the child.  During her hearing testimony, the mother acknowledged that she had been evicted from her apartment because her friends were causing problems, including causing damage to the apartment.  In one incident the mother's friend, who was addicted to drugs, suffered a seizure and got blood “everywhere,” resulting in the involvement of the police.  Although the mother has obtained a new apartment, her new roommate, who was occasionally present during the mother's visits with the child, has a history of drug abuse and involvement with Child Protective Services.  Furthermore, the terms of the mother's housing arrangement do not allow her to have children living in her new apartment, and she has made no additional efforts to obtain child-friendly housing.

Contrary to the mother's further contention, upon determining that the mother did not comply with the terms of the suspended judgment, the court properly revoked it and determined that it was in the child's best interests to terminate the mother's parental rights (see Kh'Niayah D., 155 A.D.3d at 1650, 63 N.Y.S.3d 800).  We note that the “failure to obtain appropriate housing as required [by a suspended judgment] can, alone, constitute grounds for the revocation of a suspended judgment” (Matter of Frederick MM., 23 A.D.3d 951, 953, 805 N.Y.S.2d 160 [3d Dept. 2005];  see Matter of Gianna W. [Jessica S.], 96 A.D.3d 545, 545, 946 N.Y.S.2d 172 [1st Dept. 2012] ).