Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony SCOTT, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Juan M. Merchan, J.), rendered December 15, 2015, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and possession of burglar's tools, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of six years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's credibility determinations. The evidence plainly established that defendant unlawfully entered a store with intent to commit a crime therein. Defendant entered the store in violation of a trespass notice, while carrying a tinfoil-lined bag designed to thwart the store's security system. He then secreted several expensive items in the bag, which were recovered by security personnel. Although defendant had approached a cash register and presented some inexpensive items for purchase, the evidence supports the conclusion that he never intended to pay for the items concealed in the bag, regardless of whether he was carrying sufficient funds to do so. The evidence also established that “while in the building or in immediate flight therefrom,” defendant “[used] or threaten[ed] the immediate use of a dangerous instrument” (Penal Law 140.25[1][c] ) when he grabbed a knife and pointed it at the security guard and pursuing police officers.
Moreover, there was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to defendant, that he unlawfully entered the store without larcenous intent. Accordingly, the court properly declined, on that ground, to charge third-degree trespass as a lesser included offense. We note also that third-degree trespass does not qualify as a lesser included offense of burglary (see People v. Santiago, 143 A.D.3d 545, 546, 39 N.Y.S.3d 435 [1st Dept. 2016], lv denied 28 N.Y.3d 1127, 51 N.Y.S.3d 23, 73 N.E.3d 363 [2016] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 6621
Decided: May 22, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)