Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Talyn D. WILLIAMS, Defendant–Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [1] ). Initially, we note that, even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid, as defendant contends, his further contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel “does not survive his plea ․ inasmuch as defendant failed to demonstrate that the plea bargaining process was infected by [the] allegedly ineffective assistance or that defendant entered the plea because of [defense counsel's] allegedly poor performance” (People v. Lucieer, 107 A.D.3d 1611, 1612, 967 N.Y.S.2d 575 [4th Dept. 2013] [internal quotation marks omitted] ). Although defendant's further contention that his plea was not otherwise voluntary survives a valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v. Guantero, 100 A.D.3d 1386, 1387, 953 N.Y.S.2d 438 [4th Dept. 2012], lv denied 21 N.Y.3d 1004, 971 N.Y.S.2d 256, 993 N.E.2d 1278 [2013] ), we reject defendant's contention that Supreme Court erred in denying his pro se motion to withdraw his plea on that ground without conducting a hearing. The record establishes that the court “conducted a sufficient inquiry before denying defendant's [motion] to withdraw his plea” (People v. Moore, 39 A.D.3d 1199, 1200, 834 N.Y.S.2d 606 [4th Dept. 2007], lv denied 9 N.Y.3d 867, 840 N.Y.S.2d 897, 872 N.E.2d 1203 [2007] ), and there is no evidence of innocence, fraud or mistake in inducing the plea (see People v. Taylor, 59 A.D.3d 973, 973–974, 872 N.Y.S.2d 332 [4th Dept. 2009], lv denied 12 N.Y.3d 921, 884 N.Y.S.2d 702, 912 N.E.2d 1083 [2009] ).
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 32
Decided: March 16, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)