Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
.—THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V HARRY AYRHART, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. - MOTION NO. (880/94) KA 17–02181.—THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V TIMOTHY MILLER, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. - MOTION NO. (593/01) KA 98–05633.—THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V ROBERT MCCULLOUGH, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. - MOTION NO. (1122/02) KA 00–01303.—THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V CHRISTOPHER T. FAETH, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. - MOTION NO. (417/03) KA 01–01972.—THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V SAMUEL LEFLORE, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. - MOTION NO. (10/14) KA 10–01130.—THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V JEFFREY THOMAS, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. - MOTION NO. (1042/17) CA 17–00259.—IN RE: ARBITRATION BETWEEN MONROE COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION, INC., PETITIONER–RESPONDENT–RESPONDENT, AND MONROE COUNTY AND MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF, RESPONDENTS–PETITIONERS–APPELLANTS. - MOTION NO. (1045/17) TP 17–00220.—IN THE MATTER OF TOWN OF BOSTON, PETITIONER, V NEW YORK STATE OFFICE FOR PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, RESPONDENT. - MOTION NO. (1047/17) CA 17–00020.—U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET INVESTMENT LOAN TRUST 2005–4, PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT, V JAMES D. LIEBEL, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. - MOTION NO. (1139/17) CA 17–00432.—LODGE II HOTEL LLC, AND JAY GELB, PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS, V JOSO REALTY LLC, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. - MOTION NO. (1149/17) CA 17–00403.—U.S. ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT, V SUPERIOR WELL SERVICES, INC., NOW KNOWN AS NABORS COMPLETION & PRODUCTION SERVICES, CO., AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO SUPERIOR WELLS SERVICES, LTD., DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. - MOTION NO. (1161/17) KAH 16–01019.—THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. CHARLES B., PETITIONER–APPELLANT, V DEBORAH MCCULLOCH, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CENTRAL NEW YORK PSYCHIATRIC CENTER, RESPONDENT–RESPONDENT. - MOTION NO. (1262/17) CA 16–01971.—IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR THE RESCISSION OF THE LORIE DEHIMER IRREVOCABLE TRUST, SUCCESSOR TO THE MARION A. SEARS TRUSTS. LORIE M. DEHIMER, PETITIONER–APPELLANT; HOWARD P. SEARS, JR., THOMAS A. SEARS AND DAVID H. WOOD, TRUSTEES, RESPONDENTS–RESPONDENTS. IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR THE RESCISSION OF THE J. STEVEN DEHIMER IRREVOCABLE TRUST, SUCCESSOR TO THE MARION A. SEARS TRUSTS. J. STEVEN DEHIMER, PETITIONER–APPELLANT; HOWARD P. SEARS, JR., THOMAS A. SEARS AND DAVID H. WOOD, TRUSTEES, RESPONDENTS–RESPONDENTS. MOTION NO. (1309/17) CA 16–00828.—MARITA E. HYMAN, PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT, V SUSAN N. BURGESS, DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.) MOTION NO. (1311/17) CA 17–00085.—KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT, V PHILIP SIMAO, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
- Motion for a writ of error coram nobis denied.
- Motion for a writ of error coram nobis denied.
- Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied.
- Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied.
- Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied.
- Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied.
- Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
- Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
- Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
- Motion for reargument denied.
- Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
- Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
— Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
— Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
— Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: MOTION NO. (1576 /90)
Decided: February 02, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)