KARI ANN FULL INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERMANENT GUARDIAN OF SHANE FULL PLAINTIFF APPELLANT v. APPEAL NO (2017)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

KARI ANN FULL, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS PERMANENT GUARDIAN OF SHANE D. FULL, PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT, v. MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF, CITY OF ROCHESTER, CITY OF ROCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF GREECE, COUNTY OF MONROE, MONROE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY, DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

CA 16–01532

Decided: July 07, 2017

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

HOGAN WILLIG, PLLC, AMHERST (LINDA LALLI STARK OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT. MICHAEL E. DAVIS, COUNTY ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (MATTHEW D. BROWN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF, COUNTY OF MONROE, AND MONROE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY. GALLO & IACOVANGELO, LLP, ROCHESTER (JOHN C. PALERMO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT TOWN OF GREECE. BRIAN F. CURRAN, CORPORATION COUNSEL, ROCHESTER (JOHN M. CAMPOLIETO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS CITY OF ROCHESTER AND CITY OF

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Full v Monroe County Sheriff's Dept. ( [appeal No. 3] _ AD3d _ [July 7, 2017] ).

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network